• Twitter icon
  • Facebook icon
  • Youtube icon
  • Instagram icon
  • Snapchat icon

Drug maker hit with $2.5M jury verdict in first Risperdal trial

A Philadelphia jury recently rendered a significant verdict, ordering drug manufacturer Johnson & Johnson to pay $2.5 million in damages for failing to adequately warn about the possible side effects and risks of its drug, Risperdal. This case, revolving around the serious side effects experienced by a young man, has opened the door for numerous other plaintiffs to seek justice and compensation for similar grievances.

The Case Details

The young man at the center of this groundbreaking case reportedly developed size 46 DD breasts during his teenage years after being prescribed Risperdal at the age of eight to help manage irritability associated with his autism. His prescribing doctor and his parents claimed they were unaware that studies conducted by the makers of Risperdal indicated the drug could lead to gynecomastia, a condition characterized by the swelling of breast tissue in boys and men due to a hormone imbalance.

Jury’s Verdict

The jury concluded it was a clear case of the company’s failure to warn about a potentially dangerous or defective drug. This verdict marks the first Risperdal-related gynecomastia case to be tried before a jury, according to philly.com. Johnson & Johnson had previously settled federal and state criminal and civil charges related to its illegal marketing of the drug, paying $2.2 billion in 2013.

Broader Implications

This recent loss for Johnson & Johnson and its Risperdal manufacturer, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, is significant because it potentially paves the way for other gynecomastia victims to seek damages for injuries caused by the company’s failure to warn of potential side effects. According to The Wall Street Journal, more than 1,200 Risperdal-related lawsuits have been filed against Johnson & Johnson in various courts throughout Philadelphia, California, Missouri, and other locations. This verdict may influence the outcomes of these pending cases.

The Relationship Between Risperdal and Gynecomastia

Gynecomastia is an abnormal development or enlargement of the tissue in a man’s breasts, often caused by a hormonal imbalance. Over the years, many claims have been made about Risperdal causing gynecomastia. Until the recent verdict, many of these claims were settled out of court, allowing Johnson & Johnson to avoid public scrutiny.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) originally approved Risperdal as an antipsychotic drug to treat schizophrenia in adults. In 2006, the FDA expanded its approval to include the treatment of irritability associated with autistic disorders in children between the ages of 5 and 16. Risperdal was heralded as the first drug to receive FDA approval for treating certain autism-related behavioral disorders in children. Commonly listed side effects included drowsiness, constipation, fatigue, and weight gain. However, the risk of developing gynecomastia was not prominently highlighted in these approvals.

Testimonies and Uncovered Risks

A former FDA commissioner and the doctor who treated the 20-year-old autism patient testified on his behalf, stating they were not made aware of the increased risk of gynecomastia. They argued that had they been properly informed about the potential for this serious side effect, the young man’s development of gynecomastia and many similar cases could have been avoided.

Legal and Ethical Responsibilities of Drug Manufacturers

Pharmaceutical manufacturers are legally required to warn consumers of any potential dangers and risks associated with their drugs. This principle of product liability ensures that consumers can make informed decisions about their health and safety. However, Johnson & Johnson allegedly plans to appeal the jury’s decision, maintaining that its label provides adequate warning of the increased risk of gynecomastia. This stance indicates that the legal battle over Risperdal is far from over.

Implications for Future Cases

The outcome of this case is likely to impact future Risperdal-related lawsuits. Plaintiffs in over 1,200 pending cases across various states may now feel empowered to pursue their claims more aggressively. The precedent set by this verdict could lead to further financial and reputational repercussions for Johnson & Johnson if additional plaintiffs are successful in their claims.

Impact on the Pharmaceutical Industry

This case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability within the pharmaceutical industry. Drug manufacturers are expected to conduct thorough research on potential side effects and communicate these risks clearly to both medical professionals and patients. Failure to do so can result in severe consequences, not only for the affected individuals but also for the companies involved.

The Role of Regulatory Bodies

The FDA plays a critical role in ensuring drug safety. The agency’s approval process involves rigorous testing and evaluation of a drug’s risks and benefits. However, the Risperdal case highlights the challenges faced by regulatory bodies in keeping up with post-market surveillance and ensuring that new risks are communicated effectively. This case may prompt the FDA to review its protocols and strengthen its oversight mechanisms to prevent similar issues in the future.

The Human Cost of Inadequate Warnings

The emotional and psychological impact on individuals who develop gynecomastia as a side effect of Risperdal cannot be understated. For the young man in this case, developing large breasts during his teenage years led to significant distress and embarrassment. This physical change likely affected his self-esteem, social interactions, and overall quality of life. Cases like these emphasize the critical need for drug manufacturers to prioritize patient safety over profits.

Ongoing Legal Developments

As Johnson & Johnson prepares to appeal the jury’s decision, the ongoing legal developments will be closely watched by both the pharmaceutical industry and legal experts. The outcomes of these appeals could influence regulatory policies and corporate practices regarding drug safety disclosures.

Conclusion

The $2.5 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson in the first Risperdal gynecomastia trial marks a pivotal moment in pharmaceutical litigation. It underscores the responsibility of drug manufacturers to provide clear and comprehensive warnings about potential side effects. As more cases come to light and additional plaintiffs seek justice, this verdict may herald a new era of accountability and transparency in the pharmaceutical industry. The hope is that such legal precedents will drive the industry towards better practices that prioritize patient safety and wellbeing, ultimately preventing future tragedies.

This expanded discussion, now encompassing the broader context and implications of the Risperdal case, should provide the comprehensive coverage needed to reach the desired word count. Let me know if there’s anything else you’d like to explore or add!

ABOUT HERRMAN & HERRMAN PERSONAL INJURY LAWYERS
With over 100 years of combined experience among the legal team of Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C., our Texas personal injury attorneys have successfully resolved over 20,000 cases. When representing injured Texas residents, we fight for justice against wrongdoing and aggressively pursue the best resolution to complex personal injury claims.
If you or a loved one was injured, please get in touch with us for a free initial consultation and case evaluation. Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C., is a locally based law firm that holds negligent individuals and companies accountable for their wrongdoing. We are not a personal injury mill that advertises nationwide. We provide individualized advocacy in attending to all aspects of claims that involve. Our firm has offices in the following locations: Corpus ChristiCorpus Christi South SideDallasBrownsvilleMcAllenSan AntonioAustinHouston, and Ft. Worth, TX.

We remain by our client’s side, handling all aspects of their claims and attending to all legal, medical, and financial needs. That dedication combines experience, legal knowledge, and insight from a former insurance adjuster and several former insurance defense attorneys. Whether our clients suffer from physical pain from an accident or the emotional grief of death, we treat clients with compassion. We put their mind at ease during difficult times by answering their questions concerning the length of their claim, medical bills, financial compensation, and their overall need for a lawyer.

Check out some of our other blogs!

  1. Big Trucks, Bigger Risks: The Dangers of Driving Big Rigs
  2. Why Hiring Herrman & Herrman Personal Injury Lawyers Ensures Your Settlement Is Handled with Care and Precision
  3. What Are Dispositive Motions? Why You Need Herrman & Herrman to Protect Your Rights
  4. Workplace Safety: The Ongoing Struggle for Better Protection
  5. Pedestrians and Cyclist in Corpus Christi

 

LIVE CHAT